← Search

Jay Sandstrom

Centennial, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 60W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jay Sandstrom to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history143 matches
W
2026-08-06 · GAC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Meister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · GAC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Gleichenhaus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-16 · GAC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Meister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-11 · GAC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Clifford Simms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-04 · GAC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bret Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-21 · GAC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Gribbon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
Scott Ungar / Alec Wynne
2026-05-14 · GAC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bret Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-07 · GAC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Clifford Simms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-30 · GAC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-08-24 · SS-LGT YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Bevill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-31 · GAC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roger Quayle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
Thad Scholl / Wayne Smith
2025-07-12 · #3 Doubles · with David Evans championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
32.9%
24W–49L · 44.2% of games
7.0
53.8%
21W–18L · 47.6% of games
6.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.5% of games
7.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 46% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
41 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert