← Search

Peter Ziemke

Lakewood, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 33W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Peter Ziemke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
L
2026-09-03 · NJ GREY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-31 · NJ GREY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Galo Garrido
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-23 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Kellogg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · NJ GREY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-08-02 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Kellogg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Jeremy Wilder championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-26 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Kellogg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeremy Wilder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Curtis Hammar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-08 · NJ GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Furlong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · NJ GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christopher Duran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-25 · NJ BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christopher Duran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 38.6% of games
3.0
35.9%
23W–41L · 45.5% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
7.1%
1W–13L · 36.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
16 matches
#1 Male Singles
10%
10 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova