← Search

Jeremy Wilder

Arvada, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
246 matches · 152W–94L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeremy Wilder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history246 matches
W
2026-09-03 · NJ GREY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeremy Riggle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · NJ GREY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeremy Riggle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-10 · NJ GREY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-03 · NJ GREY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Curtis Hammar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Peter Ziemke championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-26 · NJ NAVY · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nohemi Almaraz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · with Mary Rose Wilder championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-19 · NJ NAVY · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nicole Cotta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · NJ NAVY · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nicole Cotta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-06 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peter Ziemke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · NJ GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Galo Garrido
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · NJ GOLD · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Rose Wilder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 44.9% of games
3.0
71%
71W–29L · 60.9% of games
5.5mixed
55%
11W–9L · 57.5% of games
6.0mixed
64.4%
38W–21L · 55.1% of games
6.5mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 45.1% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
77 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
68 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
4%
9 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#1 Male Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer