← Search

Mary Wilburn

— year-end
126 matches · 64W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Wilburn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
L
2026-07-12 · X18 8.0 CRC Cole · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Florman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · A18 3.5W CRC Siegel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Osky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Jennifer Smith / Anna Zhang
2026-07-09 · A18 3.5W CRC Siegel · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Outcalt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · A40 3.5W MV2 Gustafson · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
Leslie Miller / Tracy Mathia
2026-06-29 · 55 7.0W E MV1 McLeod · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen McLeod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-25 · A18 3.5W CRC Siegel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Osky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · 55 7.0W E MV1 McLeod · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elyse Gustafson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · A18 3.5W CRC Siegel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amita Frawley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-06-08 · 55 7.0W E MV1 McLeod · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Scullin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-07 · X18 8.0 CRC Cole · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Florman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · X18 8.0 CRC Cole · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Florman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-01 · 55 7.0W E MV1 McLeod · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Scullin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
51.5%
35W–33L · 51.9% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 67.5% of games
7.0
50%
14W–14L · 52% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
44.4%
8W–10L · 47.1% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
23 matches
#1 Singles
10%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal