← Search

Mark Florman

— year-end
94 matches · 69W–25L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mark Florman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
W
2026-07-21 · A18 4.5M CRC Sunder · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vikas Sunder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-20 · A40 4.5M CRC Adler · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Schloss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · A18 4.5M CRC Sunder · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mickey Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · X18 8.0 CRC Cole · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Wilburn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · A55 8.0M MV Gustafson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Mercuri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-06 · A40 4.5M CRC Adler · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Schloss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-01 · A55 8.0M MV Gustafson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Mercuri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-29 · A40 4.5M CRC Adler · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Atul Chopra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Daniel Thomas / Jon Esber
2026-06-24 · A18 4.5M CRC Sunder · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Atul Chopra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · A40 4.5M CRC Adler · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Atul Chopra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-17 · A18 4.5M CRC Sunder · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Wenger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-15 · A40 4.5M CRC Adler · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marc Leizman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
82.5%
33W–7L · 58.3% of games
5.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 45.5% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
86.4%
19W–3L · 64.7% of games
8.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
18 matches
#1 Singles
17%
16 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert