← Search

Elizabeth Ammond

Williamsburg, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 24W–29L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Ammond to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-08-23 · Team Kaufman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gina Petherick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-23 · Team Kaufman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
Jessica Perry / Sara Kenez
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Cynthia Samuels championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-28 · Team Kaufman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gina Petherick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-17 · Team Kaufman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Samuels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-17 · Team Kaufman · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Samuels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-04-06 · Team Kaufman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Gamborino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2025-04-05 · Team Kaufman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Samuels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-04-05 · Team Kaufman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Gamborino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2024-08-25 · Team Steele · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Lee Bretz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-08-24 · Team Steele · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Lee Bretz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2024-05-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Beeker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
43.3%
13W–17L · 50.9% of games
4.0
50%
3W–3L · 49% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova