← Search

Mary Lee Bretz

— year-end
78 matches · 46W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Lee Bretz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
L
2026-08-23 · Team Steele · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Samuels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-01 · Team Steele · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
Jill Thompson / Sandy Piazza
2026-06-28 · Team Steele · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Samuels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · Team Kaufman · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Busman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Erin Bowles / Margaret Lyons
2026-04-26 · Team Kaufman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra McKeon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · Team Kaufman · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Babe Toteff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Jennifer Brown / Janet Popper
2025-07-13 · Team Steele · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Samuels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Deborah Miller / Sue Wadel
2025-07-12 · Team Steele · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Babe Toteff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-06-22 · Team Richter/Bretz · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynne Norman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-22 · Team Richter/Bretz · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Smock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-06-21 · Team Richter/Bretz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nan Spadacene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-06 · Team Kaufman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eve Elden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
55%
22W–18L · 53.9% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
66.7%
22W–11L · 56.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe