← Search

Zinie Sampson

— year-end
47 matches · 19W–28L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Zinie Sampson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
2026-09-12 · TCRC-Hall · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pam Berger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-26 · WOCC Stringer 3.5 WeekDay · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Garnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-23 · TCRC-Hall · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pam Berger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-22 · TCRC-Hall · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Priddy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-19 · WOCC Stringer 3.5 WeekDay · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Gregory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-12 · WOCC Stringer 3.5 WeekDay · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Gregory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-06 · TCRC-Hall · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with C Suzanne Finley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · WOCC Sampson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Samantha Otero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-16 · 14 WOCC Purcell 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Francesca Purcell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · 14 WOCC Purcell 40+ · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-06 · WOCC Sampson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Gregory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · 14 WOCC Purcell 40+ · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Teams56 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
80%
8W–2L · 62.7% of games
3.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 44.1% of games
6.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 40.5% of games
7.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 43.8% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 49.2% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 21% of the time
#3 Doubles
21%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#1 Singles
17%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#1 Female Doubles
9%
4 matches
#2 Female Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer