← Search

Julie Ranson

— year-end
58 matches · 45W–13L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Julie Ranson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-09-10 · KRA Nichols · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Nicholas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-06 · KRA Anderson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stewart Lester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-02 · KRA Anderson Bald · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Fleck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-29 · KRA Anderson · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marty Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-23 · KRA Anderson · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sara Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · KRA Anderson Bald · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginny Boland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-14 · KRA Nichols · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Winterhoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · Ridgetop-Scammell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krista Quinby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-10 · Ridgetop-Scammell · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · KRA Anderson · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Huss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-07 · KRA Nichols · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Winterhoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-06 · Ridgetop-Scammell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Beth Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams18 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 69% of games
3.5
63.2%
12W–7L · 54.4% of games
6.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 62.8% of games
6.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 65.3% of games
7.0
100%
5W–0L · 65.6% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 63.4% of games
6.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 64.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#1 Singles
10%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert