← Search

Jean-Na Koo

OAKLAND GARDENS, NY
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 16W–10L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jean-Na Koo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
W
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · with Andrew Ma championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · with Andrew Ma championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · with Lawrence Wang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
Allison Haynes / Johns Hsieh
2026-06-05 · #2 Doubles · with Lawrence Wang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · Julich · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sarah Bowen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-30 · Metro: Kelly/Ceccaldi · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kate Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-05-09 · Metro: Kelly/Ceccaldi · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Mallika Mali
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-04-23 · Metro: Damarasingu/Abell · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andrew Ma mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-13 · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with JORGE GODOY GOMIS mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-04-02 · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Eric Tomasini mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-28 · Metro: Damarasingu/Abell · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nihar Damarasingu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-03-10 · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with JORGE GODOY GOMIS mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
20%
1W–4L · 43.5% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 50.4% of games
9.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer