← Search

Eric Laderman

New York, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
180 matches · 111W–69L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Eric Laderman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history180 matches
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Stephane Aknin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Horatio Wildman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Horatio Wildman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · with Horatio Wildman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Horatio Wildman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Spencer Koh / Edward Park
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Horatio Wildman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · #2 Doubles · with Daniel Rabinovich championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-28 · Metro: Rader/Bhagwagar · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Horatio Wildman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · Rader/Bhagwagar · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theodore Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-17 · Metro: Rader/Bhagwagar · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Rajat Bhatia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · Rader/Bhagwagar · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jatin Rajput
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-08 · Rader/Bhagwagar · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Damian Zunino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 57.7% of games
4.0
66.7%
48W–24L · 55.9% of games
4.5
0%
0W–5L · 32.2% of games
7.0mixed
77.8%
21W–6L · 55.8% of games
8.0mixed
51.7%
15W–14L · 50.7% of games
9.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
105 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
16 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams