← Search

Jim Ray

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
189 matches · 102W–87L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jim Ray to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history189 matches
W
2026-05-30 · SPANISH TRAIL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kendall Stowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sonny Ho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-05-16 · SPANISH TRAIL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Janda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-09 · SPANISH TRAIL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with COLE BOREN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-03 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-02 · SPANISH TRAIL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with George Mulopulos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sonny Ho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-18 · SPANISH TRAIL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with George Mulopulos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-12 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeremy Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-22 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-02-15 · DTC #1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Irene Frazier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-02-14 · SPANISH TRAIL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Haldeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
68.3%
41W–19L · 57.2% of games
4.0
55.7%
34W–27L · 51.5% of games
8.0
40%
4W–6L · 48% of games
5.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 35.9% of games
7.0mixed
42.4%
14W–19L · 46.4% of games
7.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 44.7% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
47 matches
#1 Singles
11%
21 matches
#2 Singles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams