← Search

Jason MacDonald

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
219 matches · 108W–111L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jason MacDonald to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history219 matches
L
2026-05-04 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taylor Verhaalen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-11 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Stimson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-24 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Stimson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-03-07 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Neubauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-02-15 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Luanne Balelo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-01 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rachel Corpuz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-31 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-01-04 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rebecca Little mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-03 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Albert Quimson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-12 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-15 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jack Hogan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-09-28 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Levasseur mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.1% of games
3.5
76%
19W–6L · 60.3% of games
4.0
60.2%
53W–35L · 53.1% of games
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 41.5% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 55.7% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
11W–22L · 45.6% of games
7.5mixed
25%
5W–15L · 42.7% of games
8.0mixed
30.4%
7W–16L · 42.3% of games
8.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
61 matches
#2 Male Doubles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Male Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal