← Search

Botum Chhay

NASHVILLE, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 33W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Botum Chhay to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
2026-08-29 · Ossman/Fitzgerald/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Courtney Sweeney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-23 · Ossman/Fitzgerald/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-01 · Ossman/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maura Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-10 · Ossman/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maura Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-09 · Ossman/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maura Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-05-02 · Ossman/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Loralie Liggett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-04-25 · Ossman/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maura Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-04-18 · Ossman/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maura Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-15 · Ossman/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maura Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
Mary Grace Gaines / Julie Scott
2026-03-26 · Ossman/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-21 · Ossman/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maura Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-03-07 · Ossman/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
73%
27W–10L · 57.4% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 50.5% of games
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 57.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer