← Search

Mary Claiborne Sharpe

— year-end
63 matches · 33W–30L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Mary Claiborne Sharpe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
W
2026-08-29 · Blevins/Thomas/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patricia Frawley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-09 · Glickman/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kristen Conoley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · Glickman/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Crystal Wray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Elizabeth Davis / Lauren Pollard
2026-07-25 · Blevins/Thomas/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandy Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
Keith Williamson / Morgan Williamson
2026-07-19 · Sharpe/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-16 · Blevins/Thomas/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Lavigne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · Blevins/Thomas/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Justin Bryan / Grace Bryan
2026-06-21 · Sharpe/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Debra Hutjens / Joe Williams
2026-06-14 · Sharpe/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephan Pierenkemper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-01 · Blevins/Thomas/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mollie Alvarez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-09 · Thomas/Blevins/Nashville · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-25 · Thomas/Blevins/Nashville · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Teams24 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
62.5%
15W–9L · 57.1% of games
4.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 50.6% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 43.8% of games
4.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.4% of games
4.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#1 Singles
24%
15 matches
#2 Singles
21%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal