← Search

Lynn Roth

— year-end
62 matches · 24W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lynn Roth to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
2026-01-06 · Huntcliff (Melissa Eshpeter)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Danhauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 0-6
L
2025-12-16 · Huntcliff (Melissa Eshpeter)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Danhauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 3-6
W
2025-12-09 · Huntcliff (Melissa Eshpeter)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Boger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-11-18 · Huntcliff (Melissa Eshpeter)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marianne McGee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-11 · Huntcliff (Melissa Eshpeter)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Boger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 6-3
L
2025-11-04 · Huntcliff (Melissa Eshpeter)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julia Swanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2024-10-19 · C 7.5W MV1 Kirchick · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rita Gilman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2024-07-13 · A18 3.5W MV2 Ung · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caren Kirchick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W
2024-07-12 · X18 7.0 MV2 Nine · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Nine mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-07-02 · A18 3.5W MV2 Ung · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Wilburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
2024-06-20 · A40 3.5W MV1 Brady · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Yotter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-06-17 · A40 3.5W MV1 Brady · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Yotter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 44.9% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.6% of games
6.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 44.2% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
42.1%
8W–11L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert