← Search

Suzanne McLeod

Wappingers Falls, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
249 matches · 164W–85L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Suzanne McLeod to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history249 matches
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Elizabeth White / Jean Jurek
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Heidi DeSiena championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-05 · Taconic Smash · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Curran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-29 · Taconic Smash · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Curran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-07-26 · Mixed Magic · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Samuel Lashlee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-17 · Mixed Magic · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Samuel Lashlee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-16 · MH: TSR: Get A Grip · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Moran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · Southern: Taconic · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi DeSiena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-07 · Taconic Smash · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Ackley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-30 · Southern: Taconic · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi DeSiena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
70.6%
84W–35L · 58.5% of games
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 51% of games
7.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
74%
37W–13L · 59.6% of games
8.0mixed
45%
9W–11L · 49.7% of games
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
57 matches
#1 Singles
9%
23 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert