← Search

Sheila Reed

— year-end
71 matches · 22W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sheila Reed to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-07-29 · Monroe · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracy Andrews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-24 · Monroe · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Brumbaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · Monroe · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-19 · Monroe · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kari Rieser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-03-15 · Sportsplex Touch · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenny Sladicka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-01 · Sportsplex Touch · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenny Sladicka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-12 · #3 Doubles · with Margaret Pedziwiatr championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-24 · Southern: Monroe · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Pedziwiatr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-09 · Southern: Monroe · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Godfrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-08 · Armonk Indoor Tennis: Arsenic & Lace · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-01 · Armonk Indoor Tennis: Arsenic & Lace · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Sheehy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-27 · Southern: Monroe · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Valerie Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Teams12 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
33.3%
18W–36L · 41.7% of games
7.0
25%
2W–6L · 39.7% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer