← Search

Bridget Newbury

Dayton, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 9W–37L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Bridget Newbury to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2026-05-16 · QRRC-Williams · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra Fazio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-09 · QRRC-Broerman · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Stimson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · QRRC-Broerman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-22 · QRRC-Broerman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Gustafson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-22 · QRRC-Broerman · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-01-17 · QRRC-Broerman · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-01-10 · QRRC Broerman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Broerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-04 · QRRC Broerman · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-23 · QRRC Broerman · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-01 · QRRC Broerman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-04 · QRRC Broerman · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2025-09-28 · QRRC Broerman · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
22.9%
8W–27L · 39.6% of games
4.0
10%
1W–9L · 29.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 52% of the time
#1 Singles
52%
24 matches
#2 Singles
22%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova