← Search

Valerie Wood

— year-end
110 matches · 41W–69L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Valerie Wood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history110 matches
L
2026-07-19 · QRRC-Williams · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jordan Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-12 · QRRC-Williams · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jordan Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-07 · QRRC-Williams · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jennifer Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-04-04 · QRRC-Williams · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irina Shitova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-28 · QRRC-Coffman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Nichols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · QRRC-Coffman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darlene Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-08 · QRRC-Coffman · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-01 · QRRC-Williams · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Stimson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
Tianna Ryan / Emily Turner
2026-02-22 · QRRC-Coffman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darlene Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-02-21 · QRRC-Williams · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
Elizabeth Wood / Kim McCrae
2026-01-31 · QRRC-Coffman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-24 · QRRC-Williams · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Stimson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
Teams23 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
60%
18W–12L · 56.6% of games
3.0
25.5%
14W–41L · 40% of games
3.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 33.6% of games
5.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 47.7% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
40 matches
#1 Singles
11%
12 matches
#2 Singles
7%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert