← Search

Craig Hirschfeld

Forest Hills, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
294 matches · 140W–154L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Craig Hirschfeld to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history294 matches
W
2026-06-24 · Bindler · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mohamed Mohideen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-03 · Bindler · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Evan Yagerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-05-26 · Bindler · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Bindler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-13 · Bindler · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kuo Wu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · Bindler · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Soper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-03-31 · Bindler · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Klurfeld
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · Hard Court Rivalry · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Zahran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-19 · Bindler · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erica Newman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-03 · Hard Court Rivalry · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Gonzalez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2026-02-04 · Bindler · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Sheridan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-01-15 · Bindler · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Zagoria
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-11 · Hard Court Rivalry · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miroslav Trunec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams87 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
69%
29W–13L · 57.6% of games
4.0
39.2%
31W–48L · 47% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 49.4% of games
7.0mixed
39.2%
20W–31L · 49.1% of games
8.0mixed
51.8%
29W–27L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
126 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
78 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
68 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
11 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer