← Search

Nina Hellman

Brooklyn, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 68W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nina Hellman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history118 matches
W
2026-08-15 · #4 Doubles · with Justine Cooper championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-14 · #4 Doubles · with Justine Cooper championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-01 · Trujillo/Vareikaite · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grace Appel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-12 · Trujillo/Vareikaite · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justine Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · Eastern/Hirsh/55&Over8.0XD · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Fred Ross mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-07 · Hirsh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Fred Ross mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
Kathy Rey / Karen Blakely
2026-05-04 · Trujillo/Vareikaite · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justine Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-2
L
2026-04-19 · Hirsh · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Blake Callaway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-23 · Hirsh · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Sheridan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-03-12 · Hirsh · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alex Skaliotis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-01 · Metro: Mink · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justine Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-02-20 · Bernstein · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anita Venkiteswaran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
70%
35W–15L · 59.7% of games
4.0
56.8%
21W–16L · 50.6% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–13L · 34.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
22 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova