← Search

Brenda Hise

Oklahoma City, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
274 matches · 141W–133L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Brenda Hise to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history274 matches
W
2026-09-09 · VVS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laila Pfau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
Sarah Schmidt / Melissa Smith
2026-08-17 · Team Beast Libra · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cindy Hendrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-05 · Team Beast Libra · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-22 · Team Beast Libra · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Renee Pascale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-15 · Team Beast Libra · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cindy Hendrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-13 · Team Beast Libra · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Renee Pascale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
Michael Miller / Fabiola Hernandez
2026-07-12 · High Five 18s · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kirk Purnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-22 · VVS · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Avilone Doan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · VVS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deanna Lynn Gier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-08 · VVS · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gayle MacKenzie-Morain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-01 · VVS · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laila Pfau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-17 · High Five 18s · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kirk Purnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 39.9% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
51%
49W–47L · 51.7% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
60%
3W–2L · 52.9% of games
7.0
53.8%
84W–72L · 52.2% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
129 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
69 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert