← Search

Leigh Woody

— year-end
145 matches · 83W–62L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Leigh Woody to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history145 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Brooks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Tirrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-12 · Vino and Volley · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kassadie Gastgeb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-05 · Vino and Volley · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Laura Tirrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-27 · Vino and Volley · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Laura Tirrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-07-13 · Vino and Volley · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kate Stevenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-06 · Vino and Volley · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kate Stevenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Kelly Johnson / Elizabeth McCrackin
2026-06-23 · Brooks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Tirrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · Brooks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenni Fosbenner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-12 · Tennis Junkies · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Tirrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-10 · Tennis Junkies · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Tirrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · Tennis Junkies · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Tirrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-11 · Brooks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Rainey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Teams30 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 47.5% of games
3.0
70%
42W–18L · 57.1% of games
3.5
60%
30W–20L · 53% of games
4.0
6.7%
1W–14L · 34.1% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
37 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe