← Search

Alicia Zimmer

Woodbury, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 17W–25L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Alicia Zimmer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-08-26 · Chant/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shannon Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Chant/Murfreesboro · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Chaffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-25 · Lund/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Goodwyn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
Hitesh Dhingra / Carrie Jones
2026-06-27 · Lund/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Lund mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-03-22 · Chant/Murfreesboro · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
Tinsley Hastings / Kimberly Wilson
2025-11-09 · Blankenship/Porter/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tarah Troost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-11-01 · Blankenship/Porter/Nashville · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-10-19 · Blankenship/Porter/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tydres Mestiri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-10-11 · Blankenship/Porter/Nashville · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-10-04 · Blankenship/Porter/Nashville · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-08-06 · Ossman/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tonia Porter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-07-19 · Lund/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Seth Strickland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
53.6%
15W–13L · 50.6% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0%
0W–9L · 30.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
15 matches
#1 Singles
31%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
4 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova