← Search

Shannon Fox

— year-end
99 matches · 64W–35L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Shannon Fox to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-08-26 · Chant/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alicia Zimmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · Kelley/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Chaffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Chant/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tonia Porter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-08-10 · Pearce/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Suzanne Eubank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Craig Kanwischer / Tricia Davis
2026-07-28 · Payne/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Cluff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
Cameron Crain / Tammy Shrivalle
2026-07-26 · Payne/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Ammerman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
David Schilling / Candice Alexander
2026-07-25 · Payne/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Ammerman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
Cameron Crain / Tammy Shrivalle
2026-07-18 · Payne/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Harvey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · Kelley/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Connie Pearce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · Kelley/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Connie Pearce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · Payne/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Ammerman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-27 · Payne/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Ammerman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
Teams77 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
63.6%
28W–16L · 55.8% of games
4.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 42.9% of games
7.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 65.3% of games
3.5mixed
78.6%
22W–6L · 63.7% of games
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
24 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe