← Search

Hayden Hall

SENECA, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
14 matches · 13W–1L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Hayden Hall to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
W
2026-07-01 · Called to Serve · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with George Krautzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
David Bethala / Stephen Fell
2026-06-29 · Called to Serve · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benjamin Huang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Amith Nikam / Rammohan Paripelly
2026-06-18 · Called to Serve · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyle McDuffie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-15 · Called to Serve · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · Called to Serve · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Jeffrey Shipp / Eugene Catipay
2026-05-28 · Called to Serve · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sakar Sigdel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-07-15 · O'Connor-Holmes · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carlos Reyes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-07-10 · MCC Reyes 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rodrigo Barragan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-07-08 · O'Connor-Holmes · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hunter Bronson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-06-26 · MCC Reyes 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Daniel Rhyne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Alford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eduardo Mantovani Cardoso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 73.8% of games
4.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
4 matches
#1 Singles
14%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams