← Search

Kathleen McGuff

— year-end
97 matches · 45W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kathleen McGuff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
W
Allison Tice / Jana Tice
2026-08-17 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kendra Vuticevski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kendra Vuticevski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
Erin Daly / Marsha Friedli
2026-07-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kendra Vuticevski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary McGuff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-17 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kendra Vuticevski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Elizabeth Long / Yvette DeLisio
2026-04-12 · Racquet Club 2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Massenelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
Amanda Guzzo / Claire Feit
2026-03-15 · Racquet Club 2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Mattis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-11 · Racquet Club 2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Humphrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-14 · Racquet Club 2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kaiya LaLonde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-09-28 · Racquet Club 2 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-12-15 · Racquet Club 2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary McGuff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-11-24 · Racquet Club 2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary McGuff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
51.1%
23W–22L · 51.2% of games
4.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 40.1% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 54.2% of games
7.5
42.9%
12W–16L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
25 matches
#2 Singles
7%
7 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova