← Search

Teri Skinner

— year-end
23 matches · 3W–20L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Teri Skinner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
2026-08-30 · Walburg/Starr-CC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lissa Mummert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · Morris-CC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with L Scott Laymon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · Morris-CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vikram Chhokar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-28 · Morris-CC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Sheffield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-29 · Walburg/Starr-CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Wren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
Tracey Olds / Allison Johnson
2026-03-01 · Walburg/Starr-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne McLemore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-22 · Walburg/Starr-CC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne McLemore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-08 · Walburg/Starr-CC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sofia White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2025-11-06 · Walburg/Starr-CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Masic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-12 · Walburg/Starr-CC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-10-08 · Walburg/Starr-CC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-01-02 · Kirkland/Wilkinson-CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tonya McLemore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Teams43 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
10%
2W–18L · 35.8% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
22%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova