← Search

Danielle Ernst

Columbus, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 23W–9L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Danielle Ernst to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Stone-CCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gena Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-20 · Richburg-CCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Neal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Jamie Smith / Amy Forsyth
2026-08-01 · Neal-CCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-11 · Neal-CCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · CORTA/Matt Edmonson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Edmonson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-28 · CORTA/Matt Edmonson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Edmonson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-07 · CORTA/Cassidy Pearson · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennie Hannay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-03-19 · Courville/Stone-CCC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Natsue Haniu / Claudia Smith
2026-03-15 · CORTA/Cassidy Pearson · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennie Hannay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-08 · Courville/Stone-CCC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · Courville/Stone-CCC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Champion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-02-28 · Medders-CC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
70.4%
19W–8L · 59.3% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 28% of the time
#2 Singles
28%
9 matches
#1 Singles
25%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert