← Search

Ashley Agrelius

Lone Tree, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
241 matches · 99W–142L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ashley Agrelius to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history241 matches
L
2026-08-25 · LTFC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Phuong Palmeiro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-23 · LTFC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrew James mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-04 · LTFC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Krista Vickery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-02 · LTFC SILVER · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Bice mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-26 · LTFC SILVER · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrew James mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-19 · LTFC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Bice mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-16 · LTFC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Mayoss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · LTFC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Solimene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-12 · LTFC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrew James mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · LTFC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Mayoss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-07 · LTFC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alison Finley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · LTFC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathie Frazzini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 36.4% of games
4.0
39.3%
64W–99L · 47.3% of games
8.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 49.6% of games
7.5mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 53.7% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
15W–20L · 49.9% of games
8.5mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 28.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
98 matches
#1 Doubles
39%
93 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
44 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova