← Search

Adrienne Bivens

Littleton, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
155 matches · 100W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Adrienne Bivens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history155 matches
W
2026-08-27 · SS-LGT RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Borchelt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-23 · KC-CC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paul Gallegos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-13 · SS-LGT RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jodi Page
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · KC-CC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kirk Turner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · SS-LGT RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meg Benedik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-26 · KC-CC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with John McGowan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-23 · SS-LGT RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Borchelt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-19 · KC-CC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with John McGowan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-28 · KC-CC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kirk Turner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · KNO RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meg Benedik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
Sarah Turner / Lauren Behm
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Natalie Borchelt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
Sarah Fitzgerald / Molly Garg
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Tyler Rockefeller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 64.3% of games
3.0
61.3%
65W–41L · 57.3% of games
3.5
75%
12W–4L · 58.8% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54.4% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 54.8% of games
7.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
34 matches
#1 Singles
19%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
11 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe