← Search

Megan Fernandez

— year-end
281 matches · 99W–182L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Megan Fernandez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history281 matches
L
2026-08-16 · Low Tri W IRCD Akers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-06 · Low Tri W IRCD Akers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-18 · Indy A40 4.0W DCC Somers · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-14 · Indy A40 4.0W DCC Somers · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · Indy A40 4.0W DCC Somers · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-15 · Indy A18 4.0W SUN IRCD Golightly · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-08 · Indy A18 4.0W SUN IRCD Golightly · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Pinnick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-01 · Indy A18 4.0W SUN IRCD Golightly · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-22 · Indy A18 4.5W IHP Deiters · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rachel Pinnick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Kelly Sharpe
2026-02-15 · Indy A18 4.0W SUN IRCD Golightly · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Nicola Frazer / Allison Copeland
2026-02-01 · Indy A18 4.5W IHP Deiters · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thays Rodrigues Cardoso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-18 · Indy A18 4.0W SUN IRCD Golightly · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 35.2% of games
4.0
47.7%
73W–80L · 49% of games
4.5
11.6%
5W–38L · 33.4% of games
7.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 45.9% of games
8.5
7.7%
3W–36L · 34.2% of games
7.5mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 52.4% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
5W–10L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 48% of the time
#1 Singles
48%
134 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
20 matches
#2 Singles
7%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer