← Search

Cindy Martin

Noblesville, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
247 matches · 171W–76L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cindy Martin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history247 matches
W
2026-09-09 · High Tri W IHP Hullett · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lorrie Pavlack
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-05 · High Tri W IHP Hullett · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colleen ONeal
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-3
W
2026-08-03 · Indy A55 8.0W CRC Trott · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Louise Marsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Angela Davis / Tracy Fulling
2026-07-21 · Indy A55 8.0W CRC Trott · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Theresa Bayt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-13 · Indy A55 8.0W CRC Trott · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Nixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Keaton · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lorrie Pavlack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-07 · Indy A18 4.0W LNHS Ackerman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
Terri Shea / Beth Smith
2026-07-06 · Indy A55 8.0W CRC Trott · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lynn Hobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-29 · Indy A55 8.0W CRC Trott · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angie Bratton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Keaton · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · Indy A18 4.5W IRCD Somers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Liz Shock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-16 · Indy A18 4.0W LNHS Ackerman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelby Ackerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 53% of games
3.5
94.4%
34W–2L · 74.1% of games
4.0
75%
57W–19L · 59.9% of games
4.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 43% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 57.5% of games
7.5
65.9%
29W–15L · 56.4% of games
8.0
77.3%
17W–5L · 65.9% of games
8.5
54.5%
12W–10L · 52.1% of games
9.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 42.1% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
68 matches
#1 Singles
22%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
24 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams