← Search

Catherine Jupena

Wilmington, NC
3.0S year-end 2024
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
23 matches · 5W–18L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Catherine Jupena to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
W
2026-09-06 · Grotsky/Byrd PVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jarrett Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-05 · Broach · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maddie Crumpton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-02 · Broach · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Angelia Gallimore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · Broach · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maddie Crumpton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-13 · Grotsky/Byrd PVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sean Doyle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-11 · Grotsky/Byrd PVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Glenn Byrd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
James Williams / Alice Weiser
2026-06-29 · Grotsky/Byrd PVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jarrett Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-17 · Grotsky/Byrd PVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Price mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-06-13 · Grotsky/Byrd PVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sean Doyle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-05 · Broach/Farris 18+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Melvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-27 · Broach/Farris 18+ 3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-22 · Broach/Farris 18+ 3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–11L · 22.4% of games
6.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 52.3% of games
3.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 22% of the time
#1 Doubles
22%
5 matches
#2 Singles
22%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
5 matches
#1 Singles
17%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams