← Search

Sara Branner

— year-end
41 matches · 20W–21L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Sara Branner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-09-14 · Branco/Sullivan · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-08 · Branco/Schedler · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Basso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-02 · Branco/Sullivan · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Basso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · Branco/Schedler · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Betty Schedler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · Branco/Schedler · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Betty Schedler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-27 · SCHEDLER/KING TRI 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Odonnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-19 · SCHEDLER/KING TRI 18+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Odonnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-07 · SCHEDLER/KING TRI 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Kresge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-21 · Branco/Schedler · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Kresge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-04 · Jones/Branco · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larissa Malone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · Branco/Schedler · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Kresge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-28 · Branco/Schedler · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Kresge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
42.9%
12W–16L · 46.7% of games
6.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 54.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
4 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer