← Search

Tara Marshall

— year-end
132 matches · 79W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tara Marshall to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
L
2026-08-19 · Hempfield Strange Magic · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Schlager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · Hempfield Strange Magic · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bonnie Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-28 · Hempfield Strange Magic · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Schlager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-17 · Hempfield - Criswell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Schlager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-17 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-18 · Hempfield Strange Magic · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trisha Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-16 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyssa Good
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-14 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyssa Good
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-4
W
2026-06-11 · Hempfield - Criswell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Schlager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-10 · Hempfield Strange Magic · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Schlager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-03 · Hempfield - Criswell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Schlager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-08 · Hempfield - Criswell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Schlager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
58.3%
28W–20L · 53.7% of games
4.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 39.2% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 37.9% of games
6.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 58.3% of games
7.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 57.8% of games
8.0mixed
54.5%
18W–15L · 54.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
39 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe