← Search

John Schaefer

— year-end
168 matches · 79W–89L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add John Schaefer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history168 matches
L
Kyle Fraser / Vinny Bartholomew
2026-09-13 · Schlueter-Tchen-Gontarz(F) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Bayer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-31 · Suddarth · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Easley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-17 · Suddarth · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Easley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-10 · Suddarth · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sean Baldwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-03 · Suddarth · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sean Baldwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-30 · Missing Link (Tchen) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Wing-Yee Man mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · Missing Link (Tchen) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rachel Hennies mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-02 · Missing Link (Tchen) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Wing-Yee Man mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-18 · Missing Link (Tchen) · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Wing-Yee Man mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-04 · Missing Link (Tchen) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Samantha Spenner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-19 · Gontarz/Wild William's Wily Wolverines (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Berg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-12 · Gontarz/Wild William's Wily Wolverines (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Frank Sant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Teams24 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 35.9% of games
4.0
57.9%
33W–24L · 55.4% of games
4.5
49.4%
39W–40L · 49.9% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 57.1% of games
9.0mixed
10.5%
2W–17L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
48 matches
#1 Singles
24%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
26 matches
#2 Singles
10%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer