← Search

Rachel Hennies

Saint Louis, MO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
137 matches · 77W–60L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Rachel Hennies to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history137 matches
L
2026-07-16 · Missing Link (Tchen) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Schaefer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-07 · Bush/Pupillo · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Liz Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · Bush/Pupillo · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julia Bush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-09 · Bush/Pupillo · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anne Dressel Sutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · Missing Link (Tchen) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andrew Balcer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-26 · Bush/Pupillo · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marianne Sokup
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-03 · Marchant/Pupillo (S) · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-5
L
2026-04-26 · Marchant/Pupillo (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marianne Sokup
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-08 · Marchant/Pupillo (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susan Nunez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-22 · Marchant/Pupillo (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Almira Arnold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-15 · Marchant/Pupillo (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Almira Arnold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-02-08 · Marchant/Pupillo (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christina Pupillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
79.2%
19W–5L · 60% of games
4.0
77.8%
42W–12L · 60.9% of games
4.5
22.7%
10W–34L · 40.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 53.9% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 34.5% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 40% of the time
#1 Singles
40%
55 matches
#2 Singles
20%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal