← Search

Annette Page

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 93W–80L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Annette Page to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history173 matches
W
2026-08-27 · Ly.Manweiller18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Molly Briggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-20 · Ly.Manweiller18C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lynne Manweiler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-18 · TOC.LaPlante · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susanne Knowles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-12 · St.Luther40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Fran Ange
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-11 · TOC.LaPlante · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susanne Knowles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-06 · Ly.Manweiller18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Wendy Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-05 · St.Luther40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Liz Broadway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-04 · TOC.LaPlante · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maggie LaPlante
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-31 · Ly.Manweiler18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-30 · Ly.Manweiller18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Wendy Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · Ly.Manweiler18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Briggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-17 · Ly.Manweiler18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
54%
34W–29L · 52.2% of games
4.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 41.8% of games
7.5
77.3%
17W–5L · 54.8% of games
8.5
56.2%
18W–14L · 50% of games
4.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 49.5% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 41.3% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
35 matches
#1 Singles
4%
7 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer