← Search

Emily Slater

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 74W–32L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Emily Slater to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
W
2026-08-31 · TOC.Graves · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Speicher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-28 · La.Capps40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ginny Meier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-08-27 · La.Capps40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ginny Meier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-25 · Je.McIntyre18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joanna Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-24 · TOC.Graves · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Speicher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-18 · TOC.Cronin · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-14 · La.Capps40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristi Koren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-11 · TOC.Cronin · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachel Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · TOC.Graves · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Speicher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-22 · Be.Perkins18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryan Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · Ti.Barrier18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica McIntyre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-08 · Ti.Barrier18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanie White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 65.9% of games
3.5
75%
18W–6L · 60% of games
4.0
55%
11W–9L · 52.6% of games
5.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 54% of games
6.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 59.1% of games
7.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 57.4% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
23 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert