← Search

Aaron Vedder

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
147 matches · 61W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Aaron Vedder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history147 matches
L
2026-07-09 · Am.Stevenson40M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elisebeth Gelardi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-19 · Am.Stevenson40M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Parker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-1
W
2026-06-05 · Am.Stevenson40M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-18 · Ev.Fultz40A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Widen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-07 · Jo.Nance18A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Brinckerhoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-04 · Ev.Fultz40A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Widen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-04-12 · Jo.Nance18A · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-06 · Ev.Fultz40A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brent Townsend
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-29 · Jo.Nance18A · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-22 · Jo.Nance18A · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
Edwin Cadet
2025-05-04 · La.Williams18A · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-04-30 · La.Williams18A · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
70%
14W–6L · 56% of games
3.5
30.8%
16W–36L · 43.3% of games
4.0
22.7%
5W–17L · 38.5% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 54.4% of games
7.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 53.7% of games
8.5
25%
1W–3L · 43.4% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 59.4% of games
8.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
28 matches
#1 Singles
14%
20 matches
#2 Singles
13%
19 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams