← Search

Paul Brinckerhoff

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
192 matches · 93W–99L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Paul Brinckerhoff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history192 matches
L
2026-08-20 · Br.Ross40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leo Reece
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-06 · Br.Ross40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jason Emanuel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-03 · La.Willliams55S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-29 · La.Willliams55S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-07 · Mi.Strobin55M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Harris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-22 · La.Willliams55S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · Mi.Strobin55M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Breazeale mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · Mi.Strobin55M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Harris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · La.Willliams55S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-18 · Ev.Fultz40A · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · Ev.Fultz40A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-07 · Jo.Nance18A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron Vedder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
40%
2W–3L · 37.3% of games
3.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 54.7% of games
3.5
48.5%
47W–50L · 49.5% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 37.7% of games
6.5
51.3%
20W–19L · 52.9% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 36% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 43.8% of games
4.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 35.5% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
46 matches
#1 Singles
8%
16 matches
#2 Singles
7%
13 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King