← Search

Randee Charney

— year-end
10 matches · 3W–7L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Randee Charney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history10 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Williams-Bingham/SH/Day 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stefanie Atherton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-01 · Williams-Bingham/SH/Day 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annie Hood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-16 · Adams/LF · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2023-05-09 · Adams/LF · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sondra Reynolds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2021-04-12 · Cole/TTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bernadette Dornblaser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2021-03-16 · Cole/TTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mia Vahlberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2021-03-08 · Cole/TTC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2021-03-04 · Cole/TTC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2020-03-02 · Cole/TTC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2019-05-13 · Cole/TTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
Teams4 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
25%
2W–6L · 39.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
4 matches
#1 Singles
40%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
1 match
#3 Doubles
10%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova