← Search

Stephanie Pugh

— year-end
206 matches · 98W–108L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Stephanie Pugh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history206 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Schooley/LF/40&over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Stitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-5
W
2026-09-09 · Steinke/PH/40&over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Steinke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-02 · Steinke/PH/40&over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Burd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · Steinke/LF 55s 7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim McGinty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · Steinke/LF 55s 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Willis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-05 · Steinke/LF 55s 7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amanda Hardwick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-18 · Steinke/LF 55s 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Willis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · Dubois/LF 7.0 40s · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan Bedrosian mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · Steinke/LF 55s 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amanda Hardwick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · Steinke/LF 55s 7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharna Bovasso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-08 · Dubois/LF 7.0 40s · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan Bedrosian mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-03-07 · Steinke/LF 55s 7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Willis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Teams44 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
20%
2W–8L · 38.6% of games
3.5
82.1%
23W–5L · 61.7% of games
4.0
41.8%
28W–39L · 45.1% of games
7.0
64%
16W–9L · 56.3% of games
8.0
32.1%
9W–19L · 44.6% of games
5.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
41.9%
13W–18L · 46.1% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
46 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King