← Search

Nikolla Qafoku

— year-end
84 matches · 32W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nikolla Qafoku to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
W
2026-05-16 · CBRC-Dowson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Dowson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-15 · CBRC-Dowson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edward Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-15 · CBRC-Dowson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pane Stankovic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · EW-PC-Peacock · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Derek Peacock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · EW-PC-Peacock · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Derek Peacock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-10 · EW-PC-Peacock · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emmitt Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-10-26 · CBRC-Smarter, Not Harder! · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adam Hrebeniuk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-10-26 · CBRC-Smarter, Not Harder! · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ming Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-25 · CBRC-Smarter, Not Harder! · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pane Stankovic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-10-25 · CBRC-Smarter, Not Harder! · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ming Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-24 · CBRC-Smarter, Not Harder! · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ming Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-06-29 · CBRC -So Easy! · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Xia Suter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
40.5%
15W–22L · 46.7% of games
8.0
52.4%
11W–10L · 53.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 51.2% of games
8.0mixed
22.2%
4W–14L · 37.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 61% of the time
#3 Doubles
61%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
11 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
5%
4 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert