← Search

David Elofson

Yakima, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 37W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Elofson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
W
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Robert Schefter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-05-17 · YTC-Plath · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Degrasse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-15 · YTC-Plath · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Lozano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-12 · YTC-Lozano · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Schefter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · YTC-Lozano · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-11 · YTC-Lozano · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anthony Anegon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-10 · YTC-Lozano · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wally Morrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-26 · EW-YTC-Lozano · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Degrasse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2025-10-25 · EW-YTC-Lozano · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-10-24 · EW-YTC-Lozano · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-06-01 · EW-YTC-DeGrasse · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Degrasse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-01 · EW-YTC-DeGrasse · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danny Mullins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 42% of games
4.5
80%
4W–1L · 77% of games
8.0
50%
7W–7L · 52.4% of games
9.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams