← Search

Jenny Sellers

Tulsa, OK
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 39W–30L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jenny Sellers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
W
2026-05-09 · OK/Crossley/PH/55&over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jill Jmaeff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-25 · OK/Crossley/PH/55&over6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shirlee Randall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-11 · OK/Crossley/PH/55&over6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Candace Chonka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-03-07 · OK/Crossley/PH/55&over6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jill Jmaeff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-10-22 · Crossley/PH/3.0W · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beverly Davison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-10-14 · Crossley/PH/3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martha Endsley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-09-26 · Crossley/PH/3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martha Endsley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-09-03 · Crossley/PH/3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Malisa Nell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-04-12 · Blue 1: Crossley/PH · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jill Jmaeff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2024-09-24 · Nell/PH · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Jmaeff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-05-30 · Blue 1: Crossley/PH · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Martha Endsley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2024-04-01 · Dye/PH · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martha Endsley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
52.3%
23W–21L · 52% of games
6.0
75%
15W–5L · 62.2% of games
5.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
16 matches
#2 Singles
9%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe