← Search

Jill Jmaeff

Tulsa, OK
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
205 matches · 82W–123L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Jill Jmaeff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history205 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Crossley/PH/40&over3.0W · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Fagin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-10 · Jmaeff/LF/tri 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Darla Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-04 · Jmaeff/LF/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ambika McGee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · OK/Crossley/PH/55&over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jenny Sellers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-07 · Nell/PH 18s 3.0W · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-02 · OK/Crossley/PH/55&over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Candace Chonka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · OK/Crossley/PH/55&over6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marilynda Kuehn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-13 · Nell/PH 18s 3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Candace Chonka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-11 · OK/Crossley/PH/55&over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marilynda Kuehn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-03-07 · OK/Crossley/PH/55&over6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jenny Sellers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-11-06 · Crossley/PH/3.0W · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-11-03 · Spencer/LF/DAY3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
24.1%
7W–22L · 37.8% of games
3.0
45%
59W–72L · 48.2% of games
3.5
0%
0W–13L · 30.5% of games
6.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.5% of games
6.0mixed
40%
8W–12L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
29 matches
#1 Singles
12%
24 matches
#2 Singles
6%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova