← Search

Josh Derrig

— year-end
163 matches · 67W–96L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Josh Derrig to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history163 matches
L
Noelle Buso / Paul Jeremiah
2026-07-31 · X18 6.0 TP2 Reese · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chelsea Derrig mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-24 · X18 6.0 TP2 Reese · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chelsea Derrig mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-20 · A18 3.5M LT2 Rericha · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Lesher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · X18 6.0 TP2 Reese · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chelsea Derrig mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · X18 8.0 TP Schaffner · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jamie Fox mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · A18 4.0M 2 TP Leffler · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Leffler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-13 · A18 3.5M LT2 Rericha · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Lesher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-12 · X18 6.0 TP2 Reese · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Montara Kiss mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · A18 4.0M 2 TP Leffler · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Leffler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Clayton Cundiff / Brock Meadows
2026-07-06 · A18 3.5M LT2 Rericha · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Lesher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
Clayton Cundiff / Luke DeLand
2026-07-02 · A18 4.0M 2 TP Leffler · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Galasso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-29 · A18 3.5M LT2 Rericha · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Lesher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Teams35 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 63.3% of games
3.5
68.2%
30W–14L · 56.1% of games
4.0
21.4%
9W–33L · 38.8% of games
7.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 45.1% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 46.9% of games
6.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
13.3%
2W–13L · 40.4% of games
7.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 49.3% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
35 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer